Dickinson v. Water Commissioners
Opinion of the Court
The plaintiff entered into a contract in writing with the defendants, for work on a reservoir, and which contract contained the following clause: “Work not herein classed or defined as to price, and which said contractors may be directed by said engineer in writing to do, shall be paid for at cost and fifteen per cent added.” The contract provided for earth excavation at one price, and rock
The judgment should, for that reason, be reversed, and a new trial ordered, costs to abide event.
Present — Tappen and Talcott, JJ.
Judgment reversed and new trial granted, costs to abide event.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.