Raymond v. Hanford
Opinion of the Court
I can discover no error in this case. The plaintiff sued defendant upon a quantum meruit for work and labor done for her upon her premises at Tarrytown, she being a married woman. Upon the trial, it appeared that plaintiff worked by the year from the 1st of April, 1872, to the 1st of April, 1873, and after that for about a month, by the day. An executed contract may be sued upon an implied assumpsit, and the contract price will be the measure of recovery. , Farron v. Sherwood, 17 N. Y. 227; Fells v. Vestavali, 2 Keyes, 152.
The judgment should be affirmed, with costs.
Judgment affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.