In re the Acquisition by the Rhinebeck & Connecticut Railroad

The general rule is that, if a party who is entitled to enter an order fails to do so within twenty-four hours after the decision has been made, any party interested may have it drawn up and entered. (4 Wait’s Pr., 606.) And it is the duty of the clerk to enter orders without any special directions from the court. The duty is merely clerical, and in no case will the omission of it be allowed to prejudice-the substantial rights of parties. Upon the confirmation of the report of the commissioners of appraisment in a proceeding under the general railroad act, the rights of parties become fixed, and thereafter neither party can recede or abandon the proceeding without the consent of the other. (Laws 1850, chap. 140, § 18; *36In re Sy., Bing. and N. Y. R. R. Co., 4 Hun, 311 and cases cited.) The case of Hudson R. R. Co. v. Outwater (3 Sandf. S. C., 689) is not in conflict with this rule. The charter of that company required that payment of the award should precede the action of the court upon the report of the commissioners, and in that case the company, before any action on their award to the owner, took proceedings under another provision of their charter to change the line of their road. The court merely held that the rights of the owner had not become fixed by the award alone, but that in order to accomplish that result, the commissioners’ report must be filed and confirmed, and an order made for the payment of the sum awarded. In this case, however, the recording of the order of confirmation and payment of the sum awarded will vest the title to the land in the company. The recording of the order is the duty of the clerk, and the payment of the money is the duty of the company. The right of the owner to have both performed has been adjudged by the court, and the rights and obligations of both parties have thereby become fixed, subject only to the right of appeal from the report, given by the statute.

If the general railroad act admitted of any other construction we should be reluctant to adopt the one contended for by the appellant, for that would put it in the po'wer of the company, by withholding the entry of the order of confirmation, to retain their right to appropriate the lands of the respondent, and to postpone payment therefor indefinitely. The legislature, we think, did not intend to clothe the company with the power of perpetrating such injustice.. By section 5 of an act amending the general railroad act (chap. 282, Laws of 1854), the court is vested with power -to make all necessary orders, and to give the necessary directions to carry into effect the object and intent of the statute in respect to the acquisition of lands by railroad companies.

We think the order appealed from is within this power, and that it should be affirmed with ten dollars costs, and disbursements.

Order affirmed, with costs and disbursements.