Kellogg v. Werner
Kellogg v. Werner
13 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 452
Opinion of the Court
We are of opinion that, in the ease of a statutory reference, had between an executor or administrator and a claimant against the estate (under 2 R. S., [m. p.] 89, § 36, etc.), the rule of this court requiring the filing of the testimony taken before the referee (rule 43), does not apply. For this reason the order of the Special Term should be reversed, with ten dollars costs, and printing disbursements, without prejudice to any right of review of the referee’s report.
Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and printing.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.