New York Supreme Court, 1876

People ex rel. Ellinghausen v. Leask

People ex rel. Ellinghausen v. Leask
New York Supreme Court · Decided December 15, 1876 · Davis
1 Abb. N. Cas. 299

Counsel

S. B. Brague, for the motion,, Henry G. Leash, defendant in person, opposed.

People ex rel. Ellinghausen v. Leask

Opinion of the Court

Davis, P. J.

If the marshal returned the summons, “ defendant not found,” at any time after the lapse of the time within which it could be lawfully served, the plaintiff on demand was entitled to an alias summons, without waiting till the return day named in the summons. The demurrer is therefore well taken, and the relator is entitled to peremptory mandamus. It is, however, too late to be of any practical value to him so far as relates to the issuing of the mandamus. Relator is entitled to costs.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.