Ladue v. Andrews
Opinion of the Court
Section 524 of the Code provides as to the allegations in the pleadings, viz.: “ Unless they are therein stated to be made upon the information and belief of the party they must be regarded for all purposes, including a criminal prosecution, as having been made upon the knowledge of the person verifying the pleading.” Applying the rule thus laid down, it is the duty of the court as well as of the parties to regard the allegations in the complaint “as having been made upon the knowledge of the parties verifying the same.” Being so “ regarded,” it follows that the affidavit that they “ are true of his own knowledge applies to all the allegations, and as it applies to all the allegations it comes within the first mode of verification prescribed by section 526. The affidavit is therefore true “ to the effect that the pleading is true to the knowledge of the deponent”
Being wholly true as stated in the affidavit under the rule laid down in section 524, the entire words of the affidavit are surplusage, and do not impair the force of a verification of the whole allegations as being true to the knowledge of the deponent.
But no such case is presented by the complaint in question, and it was entirely sufficient for the party making the affidavit to state that the allegations are true. If they were not true the only remedy the defendant has is (1) to deny them in her answer and (2) to pursue the party making the affida-' vit that they are true for having committed perjury.
The affidavit in this case as well as the complaint presumably are made with a full knowledge of the rule as to how they shall be “ regarded,” laid down in section 524 (See Mr. Throop's notes to the section). It follows from the views stated that the motion to set aside the judgment must be denied, with ten dollars costs.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.