New York Supreme Court, 1877

People v. Hickey

People v. Hickey
New York Supreme Court · Decided September 15, 1877 · Boardman, Learned, Okes
18 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 631

Counsel

A. J. Cheritree, for tbe plaintiffs in error., Gha/rles M. Mott, for tbe defendants in error.

People v. Hickey

Opinion of the Court

LearNed, P. J.:

We have no doubt that tbe statutory offense must be an assault ■with a sharp as well as with a dangerous weapon. This is tbe reasonable construction of tbe language. It is also tbe construction implied by tbe language of tbe Court of Appeals in tbe case of Filkins, plaintiff in error, v. The People, defendants in error (4 Weekly Digest).

In tbe present case tbe jury did not find that tbe assault was with a sharp weapon, and it was not, in fact. Tbe verdict, therefore, is in effect for an assault and battery. And the judgment must be reversed, and tbe case remitted to tbe Court of Sessions for a sentence, viz., for a conviction for assault and battery.

Present — LearNed, P. J., Bo'oKes and BoardMAN, JJ.

Judgment reversed and case remitted to Court of Sessions for sentence on verdict of assault and battery.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.