New York Supreme Court, 1878

Philadelphia Steamship Dock Co. v. Lorillard Steamship Co.

Philadelphia Steamship Dock Co. v. Lorillard Steamship Co.
New York Supreme Court · Decided March 15, 1878 · Vorst
54 How. Pr. 508

Counsel

Eugene Smith, for motion., Horace Barnard, opposed.

Philadelphia Steamship Dock Co. v. Lorillard Steamship Co.

Opinion of the Court

Van Vorst, J.

I do not regard the instrument upon which this action is brought, being a lease of certain wharf property for a term of five years at a yearly rent as an obligation for the absolute payment of money, within the meaning of subdivision 8, section 791 of the Code of Civil Procedure, so as to entitle the action to a preference on the calendar.

The actions so to be preferred are founded upon notes and other instruments, such as bonds providing for the payment of money exclusively. A lease is no more such obligation than is a contract for the delivery of merchandise or a horse at a price fixed. The motion is denied.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.