New York Supreme Court, 1879

Boorman v. Atlantic & Pacific Railroad

Boorman v. Atlantic & Pacific Railroad
New York Supreme Court · Decided May 15, 1879 · Brady, Potter
24 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 555

Counsel

J. M. Boorman, for the appellant., John E. Burrill, for the respondent.

Boorman v. Atlantic & Pacific Railroad

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam :

The examination of the directors named in this proceeding was not authorized, unless within the purview of section 870 of the Code of Civil Procedure. As they are not parties the statue does not apply to them. (The People v. The Mutual Gas-light Co., W’kly Dig. [September 24, 1878], p. 204.) The production of the books and papers was a part of the proceeding to examine, and in the nature of a subpoena duces tecum, and fails therefore, inasmuch as the order was made without authority. The learned judge properly vacated it.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements of the appeal.

Present — Brady, P. J., and Potter, J.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.