New York Supreme Court, 1880

Edleson v. Duryee

Edleson v. Duryee
New York Supreme Court · Decided July 15, 1880
59 How. Pr. 326; 28 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 607

Counsel

Carlisle Norwood,, for appellant., Ernest T. Fellowes, for respondent.

Edleson v. Duryee

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam. —

The appellant is right in his contention. The order to file the answer was ex parte and costs should not have been allowed (Bowne agt. Armstrong, 13 How., 301). Besides it was a judge’s order (See Brevoort agt. Warner, 8 How., 321). A party might as well insert motion costs in an order of arrest or for time to answer. The order should be reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements of the appeal.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.