Spence v. Baldwin
Spence v. Baldwin
59 How. Pr. 375
Opinion of the Court
I have no doubt of the soundness of the law stated by defendant’s counsel, but I think it has no appliication to this case.
The notes were accepted by reason of false statements made
Ho costs on motion as no tender of notes was made before suit.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.