New York Supreme Court, 1880

Palmer v. Phenix Insurance

Palmer v. Phenix Insurance
New York Supreme Court · Decided September 15, 1880 · Bocees, Learned, Westbrook
29 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 224

Counsel

Leslie W. Sussell, for the appellant., Edward G. James, for the respondent.

Palmer v. Phenix Insurance

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam :

We are of opinion that under section 1023 of the new Code, and other sections touching, the subject, a judge or referee cannot be required, or permitted, to make additional findings of fact or law, upon the settlement of the case, after his report or decision has been rendered. So far as Rule 32 conflicts with this section it is inoperative.

Present — Learned, P. J., Bocees and Westbrook, JJ.

Order affirmed, with $10 costs, and disbursements.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.