New York Supreme Court, 1881

Jones v. Platt

Jones v. Platt
New York Supreme Court · Decided January 15, 1881 · Merlin
60 How. Pr. 277

Counsel

Backus and OT/ney, for motion., Joseph L. Sayles, opposed,

Jones v. Platt

Opinion of the Court

Merlin, J.

In order to fairly comply with the order of Septemer 27, 1880, the plaintiff should, I think, either strike ot the last clause of the bill served—the clause com*280mencing, “ Said defendant did as plaintiff is informed and believes at other places and dates and times,” &e.— or he should state the times and places with more particularity.

An order may be entered requiring a further bill to be served which shall strike out that clause or give the particular times and places. Costs of motion to defendant' to abide event.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.