Lang v. Kiendl
Opinion of the Court
The legislature, under chapter 217, Laws of 1869, amended by chapter 619, Laws of 1870, authorized a public improvement in Kings county, and an assessment to be levied upon the lands to be benefited thereby.
The public improvement was made and the assessment imposed, but the Court of Appeals held the laws authorizing the improvement to be unconstitutional, because no provision was made for notice to the land owner previous to taxing his property. (Stuart v. Palmer, 74 N. Y., 183.) The legislature then passed an act (chap. 689, Laws of 1881) authorizing the board of supervisors of Kings county to levy the amount of the former assessment, with interest, upon the lands against which the former and void assessment was made. The board were required, after notice to the land owner, to apportion the tax upon the several pieces of land. It will be thus seen that the objections taken by the Court of Appeals in 74 New York, 183, has been obviated.
The legislature has an unrestrained constitutional power of taxa
The judgment is, therefore, for the defendant upon the submitted case. The defendant is not .bound to take the title until the assessment is removed.
N o costs to either party as against the other.
Judgment for the defendant upon the submitted case, without costs to either party.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.