New York Supreme Court, 1883

Utica City National Bank v. Doring

Utica City National Bank v. Doring
New York Supreme Court · Decided April 15, 1883
36 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 612
Utica City National Bank v. Doring

Opinion of the Court

β€” So much of the judgment appealed from as declares void and sets aside the four judgments in favor of the defendant Sylvester Doring, as committee, *613etc., is reversed and a new trial ordered as to tlie issues respecting said judgments, with costs to abide event, and the residue of the judgment appealed from affirmed, with costs as against the’ defendants other than the said committee. Opinion by Barker, J.; dissenting opinion by Hardin, J.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.