New York Supreme Court, 1884

Barclay v. Culver

Barclay v. Culver
New York Supreme Court · Decided February 15, 1884 · Lawrence
66 How. Pr. 342

Counsel

William King Hall (Hall & Blandy), for plaintiff,, Henry D. Betts (Culver & Betts), for defendant,

Barclay v. Culver

Opinion of the Court

Lawrence, J.

I think that the plaintiff is entitled to the full allowance which she claimed on the taxation. The amount of the alleged set-off was, I think, directly involved in the case (Woonsocket Rubber Co. agt. Rubber Clothing Co., supra; Vilmar agt. Sohall, 61 N. Y., 564).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.