People ex rel. Anderson v. Police Commissioners

There is sufficient proof to establish the charge made against the relator. It is only partially denied. The proceedings were regularly instituted. A charge was formally made and served upon the relator, and he had notice of the hearing before the commissioners and duly attended, and was himself sworn in his own defense. The only-question, therefore^ for this court to determine is, whether the charge itself was one sufficient to call for the relator’s dismissal, if true. The relator was a policeman of the city of Yonkers. He is proven to have falsely stated that one of his associates on the police force was guilty of agrave, immoral act, and one injurions not only to him, but as implicating an associate in guilt with him. The relator, in addition, tried to get the false statement published in a largely circulated newspaper. Such conduct is injurious to the public peace and welfare, and is unbecoming a police officer. By the falsehood *390the respect for the police is weakened, and a lack of friendly unity is created in the force itself. There can be no properly disciplined force such as the service demands, if the members are permitted to falsely accuse each other of immoral and disgraceful offenses. The commissioners constituted a tribunal vested with disciplinary powers, and not a court limited in its functions within the provisions of the Constitution. (People ex rel. Flanagan v. Police Comrs., 93 N. Y., 97.)

The removal of the .relator by the commissioners is, therefore, affirmed, with costs and disbursements.

Order affirmed, with costs and disbursements.