New York Supreme Court, 1886

Furman v. Hinz

Furman v. Hinz
New York Supreme Court · Decided December 30, 1886
4 N.Y. St. Rep. 674

Counsel

L. Sanders, for app’lt; C. Mehling, for resp’t.

Furman v. Hinz

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam:.

The learned, judge in the court below erred in excluding the counterclaim interposed in this case. It is expressly provided for by section 506 of the Code. See Bathgate v. Haskin, 59 N. Y., 533; S. C., 63 id., 261.

The judgment should be reversed and a new trial ordered; costs to abide the event.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.