Furman v. Hinz
Furman v. Hinz
4 N.Y. St. Rep. 674
Opinion of the Court
The learned, judge in the court below erred in excluding the counterclaim interposed in this case. It is expressly provided for by section 506 of the Code. See Bathgate v. Haskin, 59 N. Y., 533; S. C., 63 id., 261.
The judgment should be reversed and a new trial ordered; costs to abide the event.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.