New York Supreme Court, 1886

Southerland v. Mead

Southerland v. Mead
New York Supreme Court · Decided December 14, 1886 · Dykman
4 N.Y. St. Rep. 887

Counsel

John F. Coffin, for appellant; John C. Dennison, for respondent.

Southerland v. Mead

Opinion of the Court

Dykman, J.

There was a motion for an attachment for contempt against the defendant, and it was denied and now the defendant has appealed from the order. It is true that the denial was conditional, but the appeal is from the entire order, and not from that portion imposing the condition.

*888The order was favorable to the defendant in any view, and there is no merit in the appeal.

The order should be affirmed, with ten dollars costs, besides disbursements.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.