New York Supreme Court, 1886

White v. Boice

White v. Boice
New York Supreme Court · Decided December 14, 1886 · Pratt
4 N.Y. St. Rep. 888

Counsel

Charles W. Brooks, for appellant; Marsh, Wilson & Wallis, for respondents.

White v. Boice

Opinion of the Court

Pratt, J.

While the judgment of special term was in force, there were substantial difficulties in the way of granting such a motion as is here made by the plaintiff.

The order appealed from went as far as it well could in protecting the rights of plaintiff.

The order must therefore be affirmed, but without costs, and without prejudice to any application plaintiff may make for like relief upon the settlement of the order, made upon the appeal from the judgment.

Order affirmed, without costs.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.