New York Supreme Court, 1886

Van Orden v. Schlier

Van Orden v. Schlier
New York Supreme Court · Decided December 14, 1886 · Dykman
4 N.Y. St. Rep. 889

Counsel

I. Newton Williams, for appellants; Z>. G. Harriman and B. F. Tracy, for respondents.

Van Orden v. Schlier

Opinion of the Court

Dykman, J.

This is an action for the foreclosure of a contract, and the plaintiffs have been awarded a judgment for the relief demanded in the complaint from which the defendant Schlier has appealed.

The findings of fact are in favor of the plaintiffs and strongly against the appellant, and we find them all well supported by the evidence.

The motion to dismiss the complaint was properly denied and there are no errors of law disclosed by the record.

The judgment should be affirmed, with costs.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.