New York Supreme Court, 1887

People v. Savage

People v. Savage
New York Supreme Court · Decided May 15, 1887
5 N.Y. Crim. 541; 8 N.Y. St. Rep. 897

Counsel

Abraham Suydam, for the prisoner, appellant., Randolph B. Martine, district attorney, and McKenzie .Semple (assistant), for the people, respondent.

People v. Savage

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam :

It is conceded upon the argument of this appeal by the learned district attorney, that the motion in arrest of judgment should have been granted.

We have no reason to differ from that view upon an examination of the case, and the judgment should therefore be reversed and the prisoner be discharged in this case.

Van Brunt, P. J., Brady and Daniels, JJ., sitting.

Note. The offense of defendant would seem, to have been larceny, not forgery.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.