New York Supreme Court, 1887

Hinman v. Hare

Hinman v. Hare
New York Supreme Court · Decided March 15, 1887 · Patterson
18 Abb. N. Cas. 472

Counsel

Haley Fiske (Arnoux Ritch & Woodford, attorneys), for the plaintiff, and the motion., Nash dk Kingsford, for the defendant, opposed.

Hinman v. Hare

Opinion of the Court

Patterson, J.

I have no discretionary power on this *473application, but under the well settled rule of this court the plaintiff is entitled as matter of right to have the cause placed on the day calendar, not forthwith, or for any particular day, but the clerk gives it the position to which it may be entitled in its proper order. This motion is therefore granted without prejudice to any application the defendant may make to the justice presiding at the circuit to postpone the trial.*

The order entered upon this decision, directed that the cause be “ placed on the day calendar at circuit for trial.”

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.