New York Supreme Court, 1887

Hendricks v. Wolff

Hendricks v. Wolff
New York Supreme Court · Decided June 18, 1887
9 N.Y. St. Rep. 846

Counsel

E. E, Dodge, for appl’t; A. Kling, for resp’t.

Hendricks v. Wolff

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

We do not think that the demurrer in the case at har was frivolous. There are questions raised by the demurrer which require consideration, and the complaint upon inspection does not appear necessarily to be good.

In the case of Keteltas v. Myers (19 N. Y., 231), the complaint contained various allegations which are not to be found in the case under discussion.

The order should be reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.