New York Supreme Court, 1887

Crine v. Borneman

Crine v. Borneman
New York Supreme Court · Decided June 18, 1887
9 N.Y. St. Rep. 846

Counsel

Benno Loewry, for app’lt; John M. Bowen, for resp’t.

Crine v. Borneman

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The terms on which leave was given to amend the complaint on payment of all costs of the action were too severe. To meet the ends of justice in the case all that was required was to reimburse the defendant for the costs of the trial and the costs of opposing the motion. The amount required to be paid should be reduced to the trial fee, the disbursements on the trial, including witness’ fees and ten dollars costs of opposing the motion, without costs of the appeal.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.