New York Supreme Court, 1887

Bennett v. Peck

New York Supreme Court · Decided July 1, 1887 · Dykman

10 N.Y. St. Rep. 876

Counsel

Walter L. Liringston, for app’lts; Eugene Burlingame, for resp’t.

Opinion of the Court

Dykman, J.

—The judgment appealed from in this action was made in obedience to the former decision of the general term (see 28 Hun, 447), and as. *877our views were fully expressed in the opinion delivered at that time no further consideration of the case here is essential at this time.

The judgment should be affirmed with costs.

Barnard, P. J., and Pbatt, J., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.