New York Supreme Court, 1887

Nelson v. Armstrong

Nelson v. Armstrong
New York Supreme Court · Decided July 1, 1887 · Dykman
10 N.Y. St. Rep. 880

Counsel

M V. B. Trams, for resp’t; Merritt E. Sawyer, for app’lt.

Nelson v. Armstrong

Opinion of the Court

Dykman, J.

It was the object and purpose of this action to disaffirm and avoid certain conveyances of real property and nullify and invalidate the same in the interest of the plaintiff and other creditors of Abram Weiant, deceased.

The cause has been twice tried, and both trials resulted in favor of the plaintiff It is quite complicated but a laborious and careful examination has convinced us that the conclusion reached by the trial court is well sustained and justified by the facts and circumstances developed during the trial. A recitation and analysis of the testimony would be tedious and unprofitable.

We have examined all the exceptions of the appellant and discover no error.

The judgment should be affirmed, with costs.

Fbatt, J., concurs; Baenabd, P. J., not sitting.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.