New York Supreme Court, 1887

Shaw v. Evans

Shaw v. Evans
New York Supreme Court · Decided October 27, 1887
11 N.Y. St. Rep. 891

Counsel

A. F. Silverstone, for app’lt; G. P. Martens, for respondent.

Shaw v. Evans

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam

—Under the previous order of the general term, the plaintiff was required to serve upon the defendant a bill of particulars, stating the nature and character of Mary E. Shaw’s injuries, and of the sickness alleged to have resulted from the dental operation mentioned in the complaint. In the bill of particulars served, the plaintiff has designated the nature and character of the illness with such definiteness as calls the attention of the defendant to the particular claims for damages to recover which the action is brought.

This is all that the defendant was entitled to receive.

The orders should be reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements in one case, and the disbursements in both.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.