New York Supreme Court, 1888

Smith v. Smith

Smith v. Smith
New York Supreme Court · Decided May 14, 1888 · Pratt
1 N.Y.S. 393; 1888 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1354 (New York Supplement)

Counsel

Thomas Young, for appellant. Wilinot M.,Smith, for appellee.

Smith v. Smith

Opinion of the Court

Pratt, J.

There is much force in the argument of appellant that the silence of plaintiff, when she was informed of the terms of the investment, soon after it was made, is an admission that the agreement between the sisters was such as appellant now claims. Yet, in view of the fact that such agreement does not seem to be sustained by any valuable consideration, and. to be wholly for the benefit of the party who seeks to sustain it, we decide,. with much hesitation, that the judgment may be affirmed. No costs.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.