New York Supreme Court, 1888

Bachiran v. Von Raden

New York Supreme Court · Decided May 18, 1888 · Brunt

1 N.Y.S. 533; 16 N.Y. St. Rep. 1001 (New York Supplement)

Counsel

J. A. Dcoring, for appellants. D. S. Riddle, for respondent.

Opinion of the Court

Van Brunt, P. J.

The questions involved in this case do not differ from those which were disposed of in the case of Peters v. Carleton, ante, 531, (decided herewith,) except that the clause in the deed discussed in that case does not appear in the deed mentioned in the case at bar. The same judgment should therefore be pronounced, affirming the judgment of the court below, with costs.

Bartlett and Daniels, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.