New York Supreme Court, 1888

Pettengill v. City of Yonkers

Pettengill v. City of Yonkers
New York Supreme Court · Decided May 14, 1888 · Dykman
1 N.Y.S. 805; 15 N.Y. St. Rep. 854; 48 Hun 618; 1888 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1584 (New York Supplement)

Counsel

J. IP. Daly, for appellant. J. M. Hunt, for respondent.

Pettengill v. City of Yonkers

Opinion of the Court

Dykman, J.

This is an action by the husband for the loss and expenses incurred by him by reason of injuries sustained by his wife through the negligence of the defendant. The right of the wife to recover for her injuries has been settled by the general term, and the right of the husband to recover for loss of services of his wife, and his expenses incident to such injuries, follows that determination. The judgment should therefore be affirmed, with costs.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.