New York Supreme Court, 1888

Slocum v. Veghte

Slocum v. Veghte
New York Supreme Court · Decided June 25, 1888 · Dykman
2 N.Y.S. 350; 17 N.Y. St. Rep. 1013; 1888 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 176 (New York Supplement)
Slocum v. Veghte

Opinion of the Court

Dykman, J.

This is an action for the recovery of damages against the administrator with the will annexed of Thomas E. Blanche, deceased, based upon an allegation of neglect of Mr. Blanche in his life-time to collect a bond and mortgage which was assigned to him as collateral security. The complaint is destitute of the essential facts requisite to make a cause of action, and it was dismissed on the trial for that reason, and the plaintiff has appealed from the judgment. The judgment should be affirmed, with costs.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.