New York Supreme Court, 1888

Eno v. Mayor

Eno v. Mayor
New York Supreme Court · Decided June 19, 1888
2 N.Y.S. 350; 16 N.Y. St. Rep. 1014; 1888 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 175 (New York Supplement)

Counsel

David D. Acker, for appellant. G. L. Sterling, for respondent.

Eno v. Mayor

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

We are unable to distinguish this case from that of In re Bank, 75 N. Y. 388. The objectionable language in the two resolutions is the same; and if in the one there was a delegation of power, as the court held, so there is in the other. The assessment was therefore void,—void upon its face,—no action was necessary to set it aside, and the six-years statute applied. Judgment is affirmed, with costs.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.