New York Supreme Court, 1888

Smith v. Kane

Smith v. Kane
New York Supreme Court · Decided February 13, 1888 · Pratt
14 N.Y. St. Rep. 922

Counsel

Thomas S. Mount, for resp’t; Livingston Smith, for app’lt.

Smith v. Kane

Opinion of the Court

Pratt, J.

We do not find any exceptions to evidence that require discussion.

The only important questions are questions of fact, upon which the referee has had the advantage of seeing the witnesses. If there is any preponderance of evidence against any of his conclusions, it is not such as will justify an interference by the appellate court.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Barnard, P. J., and Dykman, J., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.