Vanderbeck v. Armstrong

The questions are purely of fact and have been passed upon by the referee who had the advantage of seeing the witnesses.

If there is any preponderance of evidence against the plaintiff it is not such as warrants interference with the judgment.

The voluminous evidence has evidently been carefully considered, and the judgment must be affirmed, with costs.

Barnard, P. J., and Dykman, J., concur.