New York Supreme Court, 1888

Marx v. McCloud

Marx v. McCloud
New York Supreme Court · Decided February 13, 1888 · Dykman
14 N.Y. St. Rep. 931

Counsel

M. Marx, for app’lt; L. N. Manley, for resp’t.

Marx v. McCloud

Opinion of the Court

Dykman, J.

This is an action for the recovery of damages f r unlawfully and wrongfully dispossessing the plaintiff from certain premises demised to him by*the defendant McCloud.

The cause was tried at the circuit, and the jury, besides rendering a verdict for the plaintiff, in answer to certain questions submitted for special answers, found facts in favor of the plaintiff which justified a recovery and sustain the • vervict.

There was no error, and the judgment and order denying the motion for a new trial should be affirmed, with costs.

There is no appeal by the plaintiff.

Barnard, C. J., and Pratt, J., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.