Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
New York Supreme Court, 1889

Cleveland v. City of Yonkers

Cleveland v. City of Yonkers
New York Supreme Court · Decided February 11, 1889 · Dykhan
4 N.Y.S. 84; 22 N.Y. St. Rep. 863; 51 Hun 644; 1889 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 201 (New York Supplement)

Counsel

George O. Holt, for appellants. Joseph F. Daly, for respondents.

Cleveland v. City of Yonkers

Opinion of the Court

Dykhan, J.

A careful examination discloses no errors in the proceedings for the prolongation of the sewer in Ashburton avenue. The extension amounted only to a construction of the sewer in sections. It was all new *85work, and cannot be classified with repairs in any way or by any construction. We concur entirely with the views of the judge who made the order appealed from, and the order should be affirmed upon his opinion. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. All concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.