Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
New York Supreme Court, 1889

Ocean Pier & Navigation Co. v. Woolsey

Ocean Pier & Navigation Co. v. Woolsey
New York Supreme Court · Decided February 11, 1889 · Pratt
4 N.Y.S. 114; 22 N.Y. St. Rep. 72; 51 Hun 643; 1889 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 217 (New York Supplement)

Counsel

Charles J. Kurth, for appellant. W. J. Cay nor, for appellee.

Ocean Pier & Navigation Co. v. Woolsey

Opinion of the Court

Pratt, J.

The findings of fact in this case are fully sustained by the evidence, and the conclusions of law are such as the findings of fact warrant. That the defendant has broken ids covenants is abundantly proved, is plain; .while the violations of covenant claimed to have been done by the plaintiff *115are too trivial to require pptice. The case is so plain, in the facts and principles involved, that no discussion seems to be required. Judgment affirmed, with costs. All concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.