Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
New York Supreme Court, 1889

Union Dime Sav. Inst. v. Feltz

Union Dime Sav. Inst. v. Feltz
New York Supreme Court · Decided January 28, 1889 · Brunt
4 N.Y.S. 607; 58 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 641; 1889 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1621 (New York Supplement)

Counsel

W. H. Arnoux, for appellant. Theo. De Witt, for respondent.

Union Dime Sav. Inst. v. Feltz

Opinion of the Court

Van Brunt, P. J.

For the reasons stated in the opinion in the case of Savings Inst. v. Neppert, 3 N. Y. Supp. 797, the judgment should be reversed, and new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide event.

Macomber, J., concurs. Brady, J., dissents.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.