New York Supreme Court, 1889

Hydrogen Co. United States v. Beatley

Hydrogen Co. United States v. Beatley
New York Supreme Court · Decided January 28, 1889 · Bartlett
4 N.Y.S. 956; 21 N.Y. St. Rep. 247; 1889 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1807 (New York Supplement)

Counsel

Appleton D. Palmer, for appellant. Wm. H. Arnoux, for respondent.

Hydrogen Co. United States v. Beatley

Opinion of the Court

Bartlett, J.

The order appealed from contains a recital to the effect that it is made upon β€œthe accompanying affidavit,” and upon the pleadings herein. No such affidavit is printed in the appeal papers. The facts, therefore, upon which the court below acted in making the order of which the appellant com*957plains are not before us, and without a knowledge of those facts we cannot say that the order is wrong. It should therefore be affirmed, with costs. All concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.