New York Supreme Court, 1889

Riley v. Skidmore

Riley v. Skidmore
New York Supreme Court · Decided July 2, 1889 · Pratt
6 N.Y.S. 107; 2 Silv. Sup. 573; 24 N.Y. St. Rep. 724; 53 Hun 632; 1889 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 425 (New York Supplement)

Counsel

John Miller, for appellant. G, B. Taylor, for respondents. ■

Riley v. Skidmore

Opinion of the Court

Pratt, J.

The affidavit made before the justice stated facts sufficient to call for an exercise of his judicial discretion. That gave him jurisdiction to issue the attachment. There is no evidence of any abuse of the process. The property attached was not enough to satisfy the execution. The permission accorded to the plaintiffs by the justice of the peace to file an amended undertaking nunc pro tune was within his power, and was in furtherance of justice. Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.