New York Supreme Court, 1889

People ex rel. O'Connor v. Purroy

People ex rel. O'Connor v. Purroy
New York Supreme Court · Decided July 1, 1889 · Brady, Brunt
21 N.Y. St. Rep. 340

Counsel

Alfred Steclcler, for app’lt; David J. Dean, for resp’t.

People ex rel. O'Connor v. Purroy

Opinion of the Court

Brady, J.

For the reasons stated in the case of People ex rel. Keegan v. Purroy et al. decided herewith (ante, *341p. 337), the proceedings herein should be affirmed and the • writ dismissed.

Concurring Opinion

Van Brunt, P. J.

I concur as expressed in memoran- ' •dum in case of Keegan.

Macomber, J., concurs in result.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.