Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
New York Supreme Court, 1890

In re Hall's Estate

In re Hall's Estate
New York Supreme Court · Decided January 24, 1890
8 N.Y.S. 556; 29 N.Y. St. Rep. 367; 1890 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1675 (New York Supplement)

Counsel

E. G. Duvall, Jr., for appellant. George W. Eastman, for respondent.

In re Hall's Estate

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The court of appeals seem to have decided in Re Enston, 113 N. Y. 174, 21 N. E. Rep. 87, that the property in question was not subject to taxation. The order should therefore be reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.