New York Supreme Court, 1890

Minto v. Bauer

Minto v. Bauer
New York Supreme Court · Decided January 24, 1890
8 N.Y.S. 933; 1890 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1866 (New York Supplement)

Counsel

J. Kearney, for appellants. J. C. De la Mare, for respondents.

Minto v. Bauer

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The appellant by bis stipulation admitted that the court would be justified in sustaining the order appealed from so far as it affects the lien of the attorney. The judgment heretofore rendered by the general term is modified so that it should affirm the order appealed from as to the attorney’s right to proceed for his agreed compensation; and the order should therefore be reversed in the other respects mentioned in the previous opinion.

On reargument. For former reports, see 6 N. Y. Supp. 444, and 7 N. Y. Supp. 950.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.