New York Supreme Court, 1890

Manahan v. Steinway & Hunter's Point Railroad

Manahan v. Steinway & Hunter's Point Railroad
New York Supreme Court · Decided February 12, 1890 · Dykman
8 N.Y.S. 935; 30 N.Y. St. Rep. 362; 1890 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1879 (New York Supplement)

Counsel

Foster & Foster, for appellant. Lawton & New, (J. Warren Lawton, of counsel,) for respondent.

Manahan v. Steinway & Hunter's Point Railroad

Opinion of the Court

Dykman, J.

This is an action for negligence, and involves the usual questions of negligence of the defendant, and contributory negligence of the plaintiff. The serious dispute upon the latter question was whether the plaintiff was injured while attempting to cross the street in front of the car which injured him, or whether he ran along the side of the car from the rear towards the front, and received his injuries at that time. These theories were both submitted to the jury under proper instruction, and the finding must have been in favor of the plaintiff, for he received the verdict. With the facts found by the verdict in favor of the plaintiff, the verdict cannot be disturbed by an appellate tribunal. The judgment and order appealed from should be affirmed, with costs.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.