New York Supreme Court, 1890

Tator v. Tator

Tator v. Tator
New York Supreme Court · Decided February 15, 1890 · Martin
9 N.Y.S. 947; 29 N.Y. St. Rep. 886; 1890 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 490 (New York Supplement)

Counsel

Hoyt & Beach, for appellant. W. E. & F. E. Hughitt, for respondents.

Tator v. Tator

Opinion of the Court

Martin, J.

This action was for the partition of a farm situated in the town of Lysander, Onondaga county, H. Y. The defense was that the defendant Charlotte M. Tator was at the commencement of the action the sole owner of the premises in question. On the trial the court so found. The evidence was sufficient to justify such finding. The court properly dismissed the plaintiff’s complaint on the merits. Hone of the exceptions in the case disclose any error that requires a reversal of the judgment. Judgment affirmed, with costs. All concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.