Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
New York Supreme Court, 1890

In re Albrecht's Estate

In re Albrecht's Estate
New York Supreme Court · Decided May 23, 1890 · Brunt
10 N.Y.S. 388; 32 N.Y. St. Rep. 193; 1890 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2129 (New York Supplement)

Counsel

Henry F. Lippold, for appellant. Samuel Untermyer and L. A. Qiegerich for respondents.

In re Albrecht's Estate

Opinion of the Court

Van Brunt, P. J.

The principles laid down in the case of Sanford v. Sanford, 45 N. Y. 723, 58 N. Y. 72, and reiterated in the case of Bertles v. Nunan, 92 N. Y. 156, and which have obtained since the existence of the common law, show that the decree of the surrogate was correct, and should be affirmed, with costs. All concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.