Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
New York Supreme Court, 1890

Hinz v. Starin

Hinz v. Starin
New York Supreme Court · Decided July 18, 1890 · Pratt
10 N.Y.S. 671; 32 N.Y. St. Rep. 918; 57 Hun 590; 1890 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 917 (New York Supplement)

Counsel

Martin J. Keogh, for appellant. Goodrich, Beady <6 Goodrich, for respondent.

Hinz v. Starin

Opinion of the Court

Pratt, J.

This general term has passed upon this case at two prior sittings, and what was stated in the opinions then rendered covers all the questions now raised. The evidence is substantially the same as upon the former appeals, and the judgment must be affirmed upon those opinions. The first may be found in 46 Hun, 526, and the last was rendered at the December general term, 1888, and reported in 3 N. Y. Supp. 290.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.