New York Supreme Court, 1890

Pendergast v. Dempsey

Pendergast v. Dempsey
New York Supreme Court · Decided April 10, 1890 · Andrews
10 N.Y.S. 938; 18 N.Y. Civ. Proc. R. 198; 1890 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1075 (New York Supplement)

Counsel

John McCrone, for plaintiff. Abram Kling, for Dempsey & Carroll.

Pendergast v. Dempsey

Opinion of the Court

Andrews, J.

The question whether a corporation examined through one of its officers, pursuant to sections 2441 and 2442 of the Code, can be compelled to produce its books and papers upon such examination, does not appear to have been passed upon by the appellate courts. There are several special term decisions, however, holding that such production can be compelled. Holmes v. Stietz, 6 Civil Proc. R. 362; Semmes v. Noel, Daily Reg. March 30, 1886; Pendergast v. Dempsey, April 6, 1886. Upon the authority of these cases, the motion to vacate the order will be denied.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.