New York Supreme Court, 1890

Horton v. Jordan

Horton v. Jordan
New York Supreme Court · Decided July 18, 1890 · Dykman
11 N.Y.S. 2; 32 N.Y. St. Rep. 920; 57 Hun 591; 1890 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 569 (New York Supplement)

Counsel

Herrick & Losey, for appellant. Thompson & Lown, for respondent.

Horton v. Jordan

Opinion of the Court

Dykman, J.

This is an appeal from an order made at special term denying a motion of the defendant to vacate and set aside a certificate of the trial judge that the title to real property came in question upon the trial of this action. An examination of the pleadings and the proceedings upon the trial renders it entirely plain that the title to real property was brought in question upon the trial. The order should be affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. All concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.